Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Does it really matter if you are a solo or group player, PVE or PVP, as long as you play It should not, but recent developments would indicate that CCP does at least try to promote a specific style of play over others a...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.25 23:30:47
|
2. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I am pretty sure the focus group never got a say in the subsystems and that they were already in place with at best room for tweaks. The FC is a marketing trick by CCP to be able to buffer the fallout and to make it appear 'we' have a say. Fozzie...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.25 22:32:49
|
3. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sobaan Tali wrote: will they look the same as they do now or will they be visually reworked given that would essentially mean part of the cruiser hulls would be literally missing? They will be reworkede to make it easier to apply skins whic...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.22 16:36:30
|
4. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: Edit: Visuals are bull**** btw. Where is iconic Tengu beak? This very much yes! It's a shame and so bad I have actually decided to with immediate effect stop using the Tengu and ignore any sites that may require it. I ...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.22 16:33:02
|
5. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: I guess we have to deal with the fact that nothing is good enough for us. That's not the issue here.. CCP has been fumbling and releasing half baked updates and patches for a while now. Most of what they do is not finis...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.22 11:47:42
|
6. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Feka wrote: Why should it be solo on all difficulty levels? Sleeper caches are solo sites, they are not designed to be run in teams and it would be pointless/make no difference if you do. Please know what you are commenting on before you do so.
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.22 08:13:25
|
7. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
So, tried building a suitable fit on SiSi but it's not possible. Waste of skills and investment in a couple of ships soon to be worthless to me. Probably unsub two accounts and will be interesting to see how CCP is going to compensate for them mo...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.22 06:11:43
|
8. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
So the ships are on SiSi.. Thread can be closed as for some time now this means CCP is done and the changes are locked in. Smart guys they are, the subsystems are not available so we can't start to see what can be saved from our investments and C...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.22 05:36:13
|
9. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: BESTER bm wrote: Separate Data/Relic is so last decade, we use Zeugma now.. :P .. Combo scanners only had one utility slot the last time I checked, yellow and red hacks often need more. You use the board and no,I ...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.22 05:26:46
|
10. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mhari Dson wrote: When it comes down to it this is what I expect of a good exploration ship: 1-2 utility highs (probes, salvager optional) 3 utility mids (relic/data/cargo scanner) 400-450 applied dps (HAM/HML apply so poorly the sheet dps for ...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.22 01:11:15
|
11. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Actually I imagine we will go back to people not running these things in a solo cruiser. That is what will likely happen yes. While I can fit and use a Tengu to run these sites with acceptable risk, where the risk mostly cons...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.21 22:30:41
|
12. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: I guess superior sites scaled to be done in BS hull. Guess what, nobody will do exploration in BS hull because they are non mobile after warp changes, and mobility is the number one for any explorer. Besides a BS hull n...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.21 22:20:21
|
13. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Your easy ride is over, this content is going back to being difficult and hopefully that also means the supply of the high end gear out of these sites become more rare. You are going to have to adapt, just like everyone else tha...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.21 22:15:16
|
14. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Sterling Blades wrote: but if it does become that a FRIGATE is the better option for endgame explo sites rather than a larger supposedly beefier vessel, then there is a problem. Again, a dedicated exploration ship should ...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.21 17:42:31
|
15. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: If no other cruiser can run these sites then why should t3c? Because these are not any other Cruisers, they are T3/higher end/more flexible/more powerful cruisers. T3C come with a hefty skill requiremant, will generally cost a...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.20 21:07:06
|
16. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Eustise wrote: An explo update on the new numbers. Here's a sheet i've been working with: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KHX0UbkcCTQRtfmL1xIQ8TC8UytrS6N5Tm-jpCJsUDI/edit?usp=sharing In short, we will enjoy bigger locking ranges, ev...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.20 02:03:19
|
17. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Also, @ CCP Fozzie I know you have a lot of work to do, but could you also communicate toward us, sometimes please? As I was reading this thread, I saw multiple people (including me) having concerns about the exploration k...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.15 03:07:23
|
18. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Hroovitnir wrote: My suggested Change is that the Industrial Core creates some form of Fatigue after Prolonged use that will greatly diminish the mining yields. The idea i have is that it will function as a sort of Jump Fatigue that will expone...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.10 12:44:21
|
19. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
MONTYJOHN wrote: ccp has ignored the subtle approach many of us have taken over the years and it would seem the only way to make a impact on the company's decisions is to affect the share holders. you flat out dont just bite the hand that feed...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.10 12:24:38
|
20. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lightbringer wrote: Does the stupid faction BS Nerf take into account this just as stupid nerf aswell? Of course not, Larrakin and Fozzie do not communicate between each other.. why would they, what woudl be the point.. From their body langu...
- by BESTER bm - at 2017.06.10 12:13:04
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |